Thursday, 12 July 2012

Dissertation Week 6

How to Foster and Sustain Engagement in Virtual Communities


This article gives ideas and suggestions on what tactics may be useful for encouraging online engagement with the public.  Getting the public engaged is the first and most significant obstacle to any online task.  First, it is important to understand the needs that may be fulfilled by engaging with online communites:  information; relationship-building; social identity/self-expression; helping others; enjoyment; belongingness; status/influence.  So, the first thing that an organisation needs to do to foster engagement with their online environment is to determine which of these needs are more or less applicable to their public.  Next, the organisation needs to promote participation within their public, encourage content creation and create enjoyable experiences (allow for ranking of content; host webinars and content-specific blogs on popular content, and ask the public to lead some of these; allow and encourage the public to help each other to develop a sense of social identification; allow for, and encourage, niche groups as virtual "sewing circles"; link to other related interest types; have fun and enjoyable content).  Last, the organisation needs to motivate their public to engage with each other and the firm by mobilising member-leaders, inspire ideas and poll panels  (the public are more likely to continue to engage with an organisation when they feel they are a part of it; offer roles of responsibility to members of the public; provide updates on ideas initiated by the public; avoid cash incentives for participation, but give speciality thank you's; make the members who contribute feel as if they are important and special).  In general, such communities help to produce three kinds of value for the organisation:  participatory, relational, and financial.

The higher the participation from members, the more the organisation can track their interests, and help increase engagement.  This, in turn, leads to further financial gain.

Implications

This article gives some framework on how to create and sustain engagement in online communities.  This is essential for my dissertation as simply creating a crowdsourcing project will not do any good without people who wish to contribute.  It helps to have a breakdown of the reasons why members of the public may wish to engage in online communities, and to have the idea of "embedding and empowering" members to help encourage further engagement.

Thursday, 5 July 2012

Survey Responses


PAGE: 1
DownloadCreate Chart1. What type of cataloguing system does your organisation use for your cultural collection?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
AACR2 0.0%0
CCO 0.0%0
Library of Congress Thesaurus for Graphic Materials 0.0%0
Hybrid
33.3%1
In-house standard
66.7%2
Other (please specify) 0.0%0
DownloadCreate Chart2. What type of metadata system does your organisation use for your cultural collection?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
VRA Core 0.0%0
CDWA 0.0%0
Dublin Core 0.0%0
Hybrid
33.3%1
In-house standard
66.7%2
Other (please specify) 0.0%0
DownloadCreate Chart3. How receptive is your organisation to new developments in cataloguing for cultural objects?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Very ReceptiveReceptiveNeutralLess ReceptiveNot Receptive at allRating
Average
Response
Count
33.3% (1)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)66.7% (2)0.0% (0)3.003
DownloadCreate Chart4. How receptive is your organisation to new developments in metadata for cultural objects?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Very ReceptiveReceptiveNeutralLess ReceptiveNot Receptive at allRating
Average
Response
Count
33.3% (1)33.3% (1)33.3% (1)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)2.003
DownloadCreate Chart5. Does your organisation use crowdsourcing that you are aware of?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
66.7%2
No
33.3%1
Unaware 0.0%0
DownloadCreate Chart6. How receptive is your organisation to crowdsourcing that you are aware of?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Very ReceptiveReceptiveNeutralLess ReceptiveNot Receptive at allRating
Average
Response
Count
33.3% (1)0.0% (0)66.7% (2)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)2.333
DownloadCreate Chart7. Does your organisation have legal requirements influencing cataloguing or metadata of cultural objects that you are aware of?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
33.3%1
No 0.0%0
Unaware
66.7%2
DownloadCreate Chart8. Does your organisation have legal requirements influencing use of crowdsourcing that you are aware of?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
33.3%1
No
33.3%1
Unaware
33.3%1
Download9. Finally, are there any qualifications to your previous answers you would like to make, or additional comments?
 answered question3
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
Show Responses3

Dissertation Week 5

Digital Museums and Diverse Cultural Knowledges:  Moving Past the Traditional Catalog


This article is about the idea of Museum 2.0.  Museums have tried to move beyond the one curatorial voice that has traditionally been presented, mostly by opening up their engagement with the public to panel discussions, presentations and talks.  However, the museum catalog has become more and more standardised.  Web 2.0 may offer the potential to reverse this trend with more input from the public in the form of tagging, blogging and social computing.  Cultural institutions should use Web 2.0 technologies to allow multiple, and conflicting perspectives, which would allow for further engagement.  Contemporary museum studies acknowledges:  1)  reality, truth and knowledge are relative 2)  people come to know things through a social process which is generated by discussion and perception that the topic is thought well of my a trusted community 3)  each conversation about a topic is a contribution to other ongoing and simultaneous discussions in over-lapping networks 4)  each sequence of knowledge takes the form of a narrative, and are endless 5)  knowledge is knowledge of/about objects, which are things that the user knows (knowledge is embodied within objects), and generation of knowledge requires engagement.  The challenges to standardisation are:  a)  the effective silencing of the voices who cannot or do not contribute to the "expert consensus"  b)  the reproduction of biases, prejudices and other assumptions held by the few who do contribute.  Cultural institutions face a challenge is showing an object as a representation of a larger body of knowledge, and how that object is grounded in local knowledge.  People from different communities may describe the same object with different concepts and ideas, and all of these are important to the museum experience.  Many case studies are shown for how increasing engagement and allowing more diverse voices can benefit cultural institutions.

Implications


This paper helps to show that further engagement with the public is beneficial for the museums to complete some of the goals of the new museology.  With new technologies, it is no longer explicitly necessary to standardise all metadata into specific formats in order to make the objects accessible.  It is possible to allow multiple and conflicting metadata to represent the object from different community perspectives.  Instead of creating chaos, this could help the public to find the objects easier.